Schrödinger-Type Transmission Line Equation via Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)

Authors

  • Zahraa Fadhil Hassan Department of Quality Assurance and University Performance, University of Diyala
  • H.K. Al-Mahdawi Electronic Computer Centre, University of Diyala
  • Farah Hatem Khorsheed Electronic Computer Centre, University of Diyala
  • Waqas Saad Yaseen Electronic Computer Centre, University of Diyala
  • Walaa Badr Khudhair Alwan Electronic Computer Centre, University of Diyala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21070/jicte.v9i2.1692

Keywords:

Physics-Informed Neural Networ, Schrödinger-type, split-step Fourier method, partial differential equation, transmission

Abstract

Accurate modeling of high-frequency transmission systems requires efficient methods to represent dispersive and nonlinear effects. Traditional solvers like the Split-Step Fourier Method (SSFM) are accurate but computationally demanding. The Schrödinger-Type Transmission Line Equation (STLE) effectively models these systems, yet existing techniques struggle with inverse problems and limited data. Research on data-efficient and stable frameworks for STLEs remains limited. This study introduces a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) to solve forward and inverse STLE problems by embedding physical laws into the training process. The model achieved a relative L² error ≤1×10⁻³ and identified dispersion (β₂) and nonlinearity (γ) coefficients with 1–3% error using ≤5% data. Gradient-regularized losses and Fourier-enhanced inputs improve training stability and precision. The proposed approach enables reliable, data-efficient modeling of nonlinear transmission systems for advanced electromagnetic design.
Highlight :

  • Shows reliable modeling of dispersive and nonlinear transmission behavior using PINNs.

  • Achieves accurate coefficient identification from limited or sparse data.

  • Confirms agreement with Split-Step Fourier Method results at low error levels.

Keywords : Physics-Informed Neural Network, Schrödinger-type, split-step Fourier method, partial differential equation,transmission

References

G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 5th ed., San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2013.

A. Hasegawa and F. Tappert, “Transmission of Stationary Nonlinear Optical Pulses in Dispersive Dielectric Fibers,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 23, pp. 142–144, 1973.

R. H. Stolen and C. Lin, “Self-Phase Modulation in Silica Optical Fibers,” Physical Review A, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1448–1453, 1978.

A. Taflove and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method, 3rd ed., Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2005.

O. C. Zienkiewicz, R. L. Taylor, and J. Z. Zhu, The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, 7th ed., Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2013.

T. R. Taha and M. J. Ablowitz, “Analytical and Numerical Aspects of Certain Nonlinear Evolution Equations. II. Numerical, Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 203–230, 1984.

F. M. Salem, “Modeling Nonlinear Pulse Propagation in Optical Fibers: Limitations of the Split-Step Fourier Method,” Optics Communications, vol. 380, pp. 206–213, 2016.

J. R. Taylor, Optical Solitons: Theory and Experiment, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

L. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Mao, and G. E. Karniadakis, “DeepXDE: A Deep Learning Library for Solving Differential Equations,” SIAM Review, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 208–228, 2021.

M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019.

M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Solving Forward and Inverse Problems Involving Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019.

L. Sun, H. Gao, S. Pan, and J. Xiao, “Surrogate Modeling for Fluid Flows Based on Physics-Constrained Deep Learning Without Simulation Data,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 361, p. 112732, 2020.

X. Li, Y. Liu, and H. Sun, “Physics-Informed Learning of Governing Equations from Scarce Data,” Nature Communications, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 6636, 2022.

Y. Chen, L. Lu, G. E. Karniadakis, and L. D. Gottlieb, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Maxwell’s Equations,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 5695–5708, 2022.

A. Mishra, S. Sarkar, and R. Puri, “Deep Learning-Based Solvers for Quantum Wave Equations,” Physical Review E, vol. 103, no. 4, p. 043303, 2021.

Z. Yang, X. Meng, and G. E. Karniadakis, “B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Uncertainty Quantification,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 425, p. 109913, 2021.

Y. Liao and S. Sun, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Heat Transfer with Discontinuous Material Properties,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 180, p. 121748, 2021.

X. Jin, S. Cai, H. Li, and G. E. Karniadakis, “NSFnets (Navier–Stokes Flow Nets): Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 426, p. 109951, 2021.

L. Lu, P. Jin, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Learning Nonlinear Operators via DeepONet Based on the Universal Approximation Theorem of Operators,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 3, pp. 218–229, 2021.

J. Zhang, C. Gao, and X. Li, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the Schrödinger and Helmholtz Equations in Photonics,” Optics Express, vol. 29, no. 25, pp. 40869–40885, 2021.

D. Marcuse, “Derivation of Coupled-Mode Equations Using the Reciprocity Theorem,” Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 50, pp. 1791–1816, 1971.

A. B. Shvartsburg, “The Schrödinger-Type Description of Electromagnetic Waves in Inhomogeneous Media,” Physical Review E, vol. 64, no. 6, p. 066610, 2001.

F. M. Sala, M. D. Feit, and J. A. Fleck, “Beam Propagation Method for Nonlinear Schrödinger-Type Equations,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 4, pp. 292–299, 1987.

K. S. Turitsyn and S. A. Babkin, “Inverse Problems in Nonlinear Fiber Optics,” Optics Letters, vol. 30, no. 20, pp. 2506–2508, 2005.

S. Chen, Q. Meng, and L. Lu, “Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Nonlinear Dispersive Wave Equations: Application to Optical Solitons,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 118, pp. 562–579, 2024.

G. P. Agrawal, Nonlinear Fiber Optics, 5th ed., San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2013.

A. Hasegawa and F. Tappert, “Transmission of Stationary Nonlinear Optical Pulses in Dispersive Dielectric Fibers,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 23, pp. 142–144, 1973.

R. H. Stolen and C. Lin, “Self-Phase Modulation in Silica Optical Fibers,” Physical Review A, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1448–1453, 1978.

A. Taflove and S. C. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method, 3rd ed., Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2005.

O. C. Zienkiewicz, R. L. Taylor, and J. Z. Zhu, The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, 7th ed., Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-22

Issue

Section

Articles